Home › Uncategorized › Better Retrieval is only part of the legal research odyssey

Better Retrieval is only part of the legal research odyssey

By Editor-in-Chief on 29 June 2015 • ( 0 )

Legal research is a lot more than better retrieval.

‹ Commemorating the Magna Carta — Textual Interpretation — Collecting our heritage on JADE

Does your legal research need a boost? ›

Categories: Uncategorized

High Court of Australia

Hatewar v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2026] HCA 45 (11 November 2026) (Gageler CJ; Gleeson and Jagot JJ) 10 November 2026
Catchwords: Immigration – Visas – Where delegate refused application for Return (Residence) (Class BB) visa – Where ministerial direction stated principle that safety of Australian community is highest priority of Australian Government – Whether delegate misunderstood or misapplied principle – Whether principle required delegate to consider harm caused to plaintiff's family by plaintiff's absence as […]
Estate of Croft v MTH [2026] HCA 44 (11 November 2026) (Gageler CJ; Gordon, Edelman, Steward and Beech-Jones JJ) 10 November 2026
Catchwords: Evidence – Convictions – Where deceased convicted of sexual abuse of first respondent – Where first respondent sought damages from deceased's estate – Where first respondent unrepresented – Where estate denied deceased abused first respondent – Where primary judge not satisfied first respondent abused by deceased and dismissed first respondent's claim – Where Court […]
Farm Transparency International Limited v The Game Meats Company of Australia Pty Ltd [2026] HCA 42 (11 November 2026) (Gageler CJ; Gordon, Edelman, Steward, Gleeson, Jagot and Beech-Jones JJ) 10 November 2026
Catchwords: Injunctions – Trespass – Where appellant obtained images through completed trespass on respondent's premises – Where primary judge awarded damages but declined to grant injunction – Whether restorative mandatory injunction available to rectify consequences of appellant's trespass – Whether awards of damages adequate to reverse or prevent consequences of trespass – Extent of restraint […]
Minister for Planning v IGA Retail Services Pty Ltd [2026] HCA 43 (11 November 2026) (Gageler CJ; Gordon, Edelman, Steward, Gleeson, Jagot and Beech-Jones JJ) 10 November 2026
Catchwords: Administrative law – Planning and Environment Act 1987 (Vic) ("PE Act") – Where Greater Shepparton City Council seeks to facilitate development of Shepparton North area – Where development requires amendment to Greater Shepparton Planning Scheme – Where IGA Retail Services Pty Ltd and Shepparton Pty Ltd ("IGA parties") have interests in land covered by […]
Commissioner of Taxation v Merchant [2026] HCA 39 (04 November 2026) (Gageler CJ; Gordon, Edelman, Steward, Gleeson, Jagot and Beech-Jones JJ) 3 November 2026
Catchwords: Income tax (Cth) – Scheme to reduce tax – Tax benefit in connection with scheme – Dividend stripping – Where related entities – Where trustee of discretionary trust sold shares in Billabong International Ltd ("Billabong") to related self-managed superannuation fund resulting in capital loss – Where trustee of discretionary trust owned shares in Plantic […]
O'Connell v Director of Public Prosecutions [2026] HCA 41 (04 November 2026) (Gageler CJ; Gordon, Edelman, Steward, Gleeson, Jagot and Beech-Jones JJ) 3 November 2026
Catchwords: Criminal practice – Appeal – Unreasonable verdict – Circumstantial case – Where victim dislodged from outside of moving vehicle – Where Court of Appeal set aside verdict of guilty of murder and substituted verdict of guilty of manslaughter – Whether determination of unreasonable verdict on hypothesis raised by Court of Appeal inconsistent with adversarial […]
Uber Australia Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2026] HCA 40 (04 November 2026) (Gageler CJ; Gordon, Edelman, Steward, Gleeson, Jagot and Beech-Jones JJ) 3 November 2026
Catchwords: Payroll tax – Relevant contracts – Taxable wages – Where Uber operated rideshare system – Where Uber and drivers entered into contracts ("Driver Contracts") – Where rider and driver entered into separate contract – Where drivers supplied driving services – Where contract between driver and rider made through Uber applications – Where Uber remitted […]
Morton v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2026] HCA 38 (14 October 2026) (Gageler CJ; Jagot and Beech-Jones JJ) 13 October 2026
Catchwords: Immigration – Visas – Where delegate refused application for Return (Residence) (Class BB) visa – Where ministerial direction required consideration of protection of Australian community and extent of impediments applicant may face if removed – Whether delegate failed to consider information concerning access to medication, therapy and supports in Singapore – Whether delegate failed […]
Smith v Chief Executive, Queensland Corrective Services [2026] HCA 37 (14 October 2026) (Gordon A-Cj, Edelman, Gleeson, Jagot and Beech-Jones JJ) 13 October 2026
Catchwords: Administrative law – Judicial review – Prohibition on applying to participate in or participating in "assisted reproductive technology" – Corrective Services Act 2006 (Qld) – Where appellant prisoner in corrective services facility – Where appellant likely to experience material reduction in fertility prior to release – Where appellant applied to first respondent for approval […]

Jade Legal Research Blog

News from the BarNet JADE legal research platform editorial team

Better Retrieval is only part of the legal research odyssey

Like this:

Related

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Better Retrieval is only part of the legal research odyssey

Share this:

Like this:

Related

Leave a Reply Cancel reply