Home › New Features › Mobile Legal Research › JADE — Legal Research and the iPad

JADE — Legal Research and the iPad

By Editor-in-Chief on 10 June 2010 • ( 0 )

We are delighted by the relatively large number of users undertaking legal research on JADE using Apple’s new iPad.

Our entire interface works well with finger gestures. Let us know if you have extra gestures in mind for some judgments.

‹ JADE Panels

JADE updated to version 3.2.0.63 ›

Categories: Mobile Legal Research

High Court of Australia

Morton v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2026] HCA 38 (14 October 2026) (Gageler CJ; Jagot and Beech-Jones JJ) 13 October 2026
Catchwords: Immigration – Visas – Where delegate refused application for Return (Residence) (Class BB) visa – Where ministerial direction required consideration of protection of Australian community and extent of impediments applicant may face if removed – Whether delegate failed to consider information concerning access to medication, therapy and supports in Singapore – Whether delegate failed […]
Smith v Chief Executive, Queensland Corrective Services [2026] HCA 37 (14 October 2026) (Gordon A-Cj, Edelman, Gleeson, Jagot and Beech-Jones JJ) 13 October 2026
Catchwords: Administrative law – Judicial review – Prohibition on applying to participate in or participating in "assisted reproductive technology" – Corrective Services Act 2006 (Qld) – Where appellant prisoner in corrective services facility – Where appellant likely to experience material reduction in fertility prior to release – Where appellant applied to first respondent for approval […]
MACH Energy Australia Pty Ltd v Denman Aberdeen Muswellbrook Scone Healthy Environment Group Inc [2026] HCA 35 (07 October 2026) (Gageler CJ; Gordon, Edelman, Jagot and Beech-Jones JJ) 6 October 2026
Catchwords: Administrative law – Judicial review – Where appellant sought development consent for project to extend and expand coal mine – Where Independent Planning Commission of New South Wales ("Commission") granted development consent – Where Scope 3 emissions constituted 98 per cent of project's total greenhouse gas emissions – Where no conditions to minimise Scope […]
The King v Bechaud [2026] HCA 36 (07 October 2026) (Gageler CJ; Gordon, Gleeson, Jagot and Beech-Jones JJ) 6 October 2026
Catchwords: Criminal practice – Jury trial – Separation of jury after retirement and before verdict given or jury discharged – Juries Act 2000 (Vic) – Where jurors took separation oath on first day of trial – Where trial judge twice permitted jury to separate after retirement and before verdict or discharge – Where jury not […]
Dale Haines by his litigation guardian Barbara Ramjan v Attorney General of NSW [2026] HCA 34 (09 September 2026) (Edelman, Jagot and Beech-Jones JJ) 9 September 2026
Catchwords: Mental health – Forensic patient – Extension of status as forensic patient – Where making of extension order subject to Mental Health and Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Act 2020 (NSW), s 122(1) – Where s 122(1) requires satisfaction both that forensic patient poses unacceptable risk and that the risk cannot be adequately managed by […]
EGH19 v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2026] HCA 33 (09 September 2026) (Gordon, Steward and Gleeson JJ) 9 September 2026
Catchwords: Administrative law – Judicial review − Where plaintiff's Protection (Class XA) (Subclass 866) visa cancelled on character grounds ("Cancellation Decision") − Where plaintiff made representations to Minister seeking revocation of Cancellation Decision referring to material already held by Department − Where no real prospect of plaintiff being removed from Australia in reasonably foreseeable future […]
GXT25 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2026] HCA 32 (09 September 2026) (Gageler CJ; Steward and Jagot JJ) 9 September 2026
Catchwords: Administrative law – Judicial review – Where delegate refused application for Protection (Subclass 866) visa – Where plaintiff claimed protection on basis of fear of harm by reason of religion –Where plaintiff subsequently raised fear of harm by reason of sexual orientation – Where delegate found sexual orientation claim fabricated – Whether denial of […]
R Lawyers v Mr Daily [No 2] [2026] HCA 31 (09 September 2026) (Gageler CJ; Gordon, Edelman, Jagot and Beech-Jones JJ) 9 September 2026
Orders: Application dismissed with costs.
Coal Mining Industry (Long Service Leave Funding) Corporation v Orica Australia Pty Ltd [2026] HCA 30 (09 September 2026) (Gageler CJ; Gordon, Steward, Gleeson and Jagot JJ) 9 September 2026
Catchwords: Industrial law (Cth) – Coal industry – Statutory interpretation – Portable long service leave scheme – Where employers required to make payments in respect of "eligible employees" defined in s 4(1) of Coal Mining Industry (Long Service Leave) Administration Act 1992 (Cth) – Where respondent provided shotfiring services to black coal mines through employees […]

Jade Legal Research Blog

News from the BarNet JADE legal research platform editorial team

JADE — Legal Research and the iPad

Like this:

Related

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

JADE — Legal Research and the iPad

Share this:

Like this:

Related

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Discover more from Jade Legal Research Blog