Category Archives: Law Reports

2017 – The Year in Review

What a year it has been! The team at JADE and Little William Bourke (the publisher of the Victorian Reports) have welcomed new friends, said goodbye to old ones; collectively flown tens of thousands of kilometres to teach, learn and explore new opportunities; and continued on our mission as leading digital disruptors in the legal information and research space.

We’ve travelled the country far and wide this year, delivering training sessions to our faithful subscribers and wooing new ones with the power of JADE and the technological advances in law reporting. Once again, we were overwhelmed with feedback from our users about how JADE Professional helps them work faster, better and smarter.

Here are some highlights of the year that has been 2017 …

Wishing you all a happy festive season, and a happy, healthy and prosperous New Year!

From all the team at BarNet, JADE and Little William Bourke

Launch of the New South Wales Law Reports online portal

Under the BarNet banner, we were very privileged to work with the Council of Law Reporting of New South Wales to build their online portal for the New South Wales Law Reports. In the same mould as the Victorian Reports, our aim was to develop a portal that allows the democratic access to all of the reported cases of the New South Wales Supreme Court in a flexible and cost-effective manner.

Launched in June this year by his Honour Chief Justice Bathurst, the NSWLR portal has been well received, not only in its home state but interstate and internationally.

The Chief Justice welcomed the introduction of the online portal, which gives users access to the State Reports dating back to 1900 and all New South Wales Law Reports, as having “the important role of bringing forgotten judgements back into the light”. (The Hon T F Bathurst AC, Chief Justice of New South Wales, ‘Launch of the Electronic State Reports (New South Wales)’. (Speech delivered at the launch of the NSW Law Reports, Ceremonial Court, Supreme Court of New South Wales, 28 June 2017.)

On a daily basis, we see users from far and wide accessing judgements of the New South Wales Supreme Court … from a user in WA downloading Baltic Shipping Company v Dillon “Mikhail Lermontov” (1991) 22 NSWLR 1, to a user in Yorktown Heights, New York ordering a copy of Proctor v Jetway Aviation [1982] 2 NSWLR 264.

The launch of the NSWLR portal represents another exciting development in not only the evolution of law reporting but the preservation of Australian legal history.


“The report of my death was an exaggeration.” – The Printed Word*

(*Actually, it was Mark Twain – Gary Scharnhorst (Ed), Mark Twain: The Complete Interviews (University of Alabama Press, 2006)).

The way in which we consume information and literature has evolved significantly over the last 10 years. For publishers of printed material, this change in consumption has necessitated a move to digital publishing, with a strong demand for content to be made available across a multitude of devices, and accessible 24/7 from any location.

The impact of the “digital age” on our consumption of information and literature has been particularly noticeable in the area of legal research and information. The timely and accurate dissemination, and management of general information as to society, politics and human behaviour; and more specific legal information such as decisions of courts, legislation and regulations etc, is essential to the proper function of our legal system.

The digitisation of legal information has come about in response to the needs of the profession, driven by the use of new technologies. Word processing software, the internet, email, smart phones, online court registries and e-litigation have all changed the way in which lawyers and law makers go about their daily business.

Publishers of legal information have had to respond to the demand for material to be available through digital channels, while continuing to fulfil demand, albeit diminishing, for their print publications. In an effort to develop viable business models and maintain profit margins, local editorial and print production facilities were moved off-shore; and pricing structures were changed.

Printed material is now likely to be bundled with (often unrelated) electronic subscriptions, thereby diluting the value of print and inferring that products such as bound case volumes and cumulative indices are a luxury, over-priced and unnecessary. However, one might be so bold to posit that notwithstanding the use of new technology, many within the profession still cherish the tactility and utility of paper, and resort to printing material accessed via digital platforms. Tell us … is this you?

Author Mark Kurlansky, in his 2016 work “Paper: Paging Through History”, argues that technology does not shape society; society shapes technology:

“Chroniclers of the role of paper in history are given to extravagant pronouncements: Architecture would not have been possible without paper. Without paper, there would have been no Renaissance. If there had been no paper, the Industrial Revolution would not have been possible. None of these statements is true. These developments came about because society had come to a point where they were needed. This is true of all technology, but in the case of paper, it is particularly clear.”

While the practice and administration of the law is at the mercy of constantly evolving technologies, the accurate recording and robust preservation of legal information is paramount to the rule of law and access to justice. As such, it is the lawyers and law makers, and not profit margins or business models, that should shape the technology of legal research and information.

We respectfully submit, therefore, that any report of the death of the printed word (at least in the context of legal research and information) is an exaggeration.